Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91E209B7D for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 01:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77213 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2012 01:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 77176 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2012 01:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 77168 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2012 01:35:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:35:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:35:29 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 13C7A182B70; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:35:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-dev@camel.apache.org.Bid8m1JLRN Received: from dilbert.dankulp.com (c-24-91-72-253.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.72.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B31E2182A77; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:35:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kulp To: dev@camel.apache.org Cc: Babak Vahdat Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Apache Camel 2.10 release Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:35:03 -0400 Message-ID: <2182745.ImeeYvSRCi@dilbert.dankulp.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.2; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1339028041333-5714097.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1339028041333-5714097.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 05:14:01 PM Babak Vahdat wrote: > Hi Christian >=20 > according to what I've read many times by this thread I assumed we do= > always skip running the OSGi tests on CI-Servers so why I did already= > check-in the update for QuickFIX/J but apparently I did misunderstand= > something here. >=20 > I'm also puzzled about the last JDK7 build: >=20 > https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.fulltest.java7/127/ >=20 > Although I did enable the camel-quickfix module inside POM: >=20 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/pom.xml?view=3Dlo= g&pathr > ev=3D1346880 You removed the java6 profile which enabled it on j6. However, you did= n't=20 add it back into the main modules list at the top. Thus, it's not not=20= enabled at all on any platform. =20 > It was still skipped through Jenkins! I also don't own the required r= ights > on Jenkins, for example for hitting a manual build, etc. Do you know = who > I can ask for that right? I just added you. If you re-login to Jenkins, it should pick it up. Dan =20 > Babak >=20 >=20 > Christian Mueller wrote >=20 > > We have to wait for a few SMX bundle releases (at present, we have > > SNAPSHOT > > dependencies in our features definitions)... > >=20 > > Best, > > Christian > >=20 > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Babak Vahdat <babak.vahdat@>w= rote: > >> Hi > >>=20 > >> Upgrade to QuickFIX/J 1.5.2 is already done (CAMEL-5334). As well = the > >> camel-quickfix module is now enabled again on the Jenkins > >> (Camel.trunk.fulltest.java7). > >>=20 > >> I did test both on OS X as well as WIN (JDK 6 & JDK 7). So let's s= ee > >> how > >> it > >> will go through the next build... > >>=20 > >> Babak > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote > >>=20 > >> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Babak Vahdat > >> >=20 > >> > <babak.vahdat@> wrote: > >> >> The Java 7 support is not completely done yet as camel-quickfix= is > >>=20 > >> still > >>=20 > >> >> the > >> >> last missing piece of the task (currently disabled on the > >> >> CI-Server). > >>=20 > >> I > >>=20 > >> >> did > >> >> play around with upgrading to quickfixj 1.5.2 which first had s= ome > >> >> compilation error as well as unit-test failures (NPE) which I e= asily > >> >> could > >> >> fix locally. I'm just waiting for the bundle of it: > >> >>=20 > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1153 > >> >=20 > >> > So does quickfix 1.5.2 work with Java 7? > >> >=20 > >> > Regardless of what its not a showstopper for the Camel 2.10 rele= ase. > >> > We can add to known issues that camel-quickfix is known to not w= ork > >> > with Java7 due QuickFix itself. > >> >=20 > >> > The release will be built using java 6, and thus the camel-quick= fix > >> > component will be included. > >> >=20 > >> >> Babak > >> >>=20 > >> >>=20 > >> >> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote > >> >>=20 > >> >>> Hi > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> So the Java 7 support is now done. > >> >>> And when CXF 2.6.1 is out, we should be in a shape for a relea= se. > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> I have created a JIRA version 2.11, and moved some tickets fro= m > >> >>> 2.10 > >>=20 > >> to > >>=20 > >> >>> that. > >> >>> As we should focus on closing the last bugs, minor improvement= s > >> >>> etc. > >> >>> And keep eye on the CI servers to have a good build. > >> >>> And test the examples. I think the twitter example is broken. > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> Anything in particular you would like in 2.10, that are not ye= t > >> >>> done? > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Daniel Kulp <dan@> wrot= e: > >> >>>> On Monday, May 28, 2012 06:17:27 PM Christian M=FCller wrote:= > >> >>>>> Camel 2.9.0 is now out since almost 5 month. In the next day= s, I > >>=20 > >> will > >>=20 > >> >>>>> have > >> >>>>> more often an eye on Jenkis to see whether we have issues we= have > >>=20 > >> to > >>=20 > >> >>>>> fix. > >> >>>>> I will support Claus for the outstanding Java 7 issue. > >> >>>>> If everything run's fine, we should start the release proced= ure > >> >>>>> in > >> >>>>> this > >> >>>>> or > >> >>>>> next week. Do we already have release manager for this relea= se? > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>> We'll need/want to wait for CXF 2.6.1 which I hope to build l= ater > >> >>>> tonight > >> >>>> or > >> >>>> tomorrow. > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>>> Afterwards we should roll out Camel 2.8.7., our last officia= l > >> >>>>> 2.8. > >> >>>>> release. I could do this, if no one else want do it. > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>> We'll also need/want to wait for 2.5.4 for a similar reason. = I'm > >>=20 > >> also > >>=20 > >> >>>> a > >> >>>> bit uncomfortable saying "last official". 2.8.0 was releas= ed > >> >>>> last > >> >>>> July > >> >>>> so > >> >>>> I would expect about one more before a full year of patches i= s up. > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>> -- > >> >>>> Daniel Kulp > >> >>>> dan@ > >> >>>> http://dankulp.com/blog > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Claus Ibsen > >> >>> ----------------- > >> >>> FuseSource > >> >>> Email: cibsen@ > >> >>> Web: http://fusesource.com > >> >>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > >> >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com > >> >>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > >> >>=20 > >> >> -- > >>=20 > >> >> View this message in context: > >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Camel-2-10-releas= e-tp5 > >> 691194p5713866.html>>=20 > >> >> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.= com. > >> >=20 > >> > -- > >> > Claus Ibsen > >> > ----------------- > >> > FuseSource > >> > Email: cibsen@ > >> > Web: http://fusesource.com > >> > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > >> > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > >> > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > >>=20 > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Camel-2-10-releas= e-tp5 > >> 691194p5714066.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list > >> archive at Nabble.com. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Camel-2-10-release-t= p569 > 1194p5714097.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archiv= e at > Nabble.com. --=20 Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com