Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C91A39659 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7492 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2012 07:20:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 7184 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2012 07:20:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 7148 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2012 07:20:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:20:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of freeman.fang@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.45] (HELO mail-pz0-f45.google.com) (209.85.210.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:20:30 +0000 Received: by dadv2 with SMTP id v2so3678503dad.32 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:20:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject :date:references:x-mailer; bh=o58GJPS6Njq01wb5fHFpTdFQR2P6mI51f6Air426p48=; b=YmexIqP1qfWsTQuplK7A/FKM1M//0X3qa5U6ZgoGdIpDJzkLqP+9enqXLeaA63l1dG tTyUEKjluHR1AnBrMVkuojjsiwdSHIL0E8TZI+PU2u4hjEAEZx1WDPnfzAtWdaLPJO0Z IkpagUScIVwk/5PTpW77ZR4NHlJKlsMFccayG36kaP3kh58v1CK5BIvBtBGEmnOyW7ZN zNZSs1Q9R2UvOrZItXfistVJuJbCaGZ4RTGvdcpSOJsSj4JZd9/2VqvWD1cvqjtwK501 v5OGEvmQ4PpRdvRXcsDJ91UOtWM397RrlIFmS3XEhyoJncXIVi8+uE5GKAGNqD4g6r8A ZVag== Received: by 10.68.192.67 with SMTP id he3mr14896371pbc.114.1337325609684; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([123.119.253.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id in7sm3216254pbc.23.2012.05.18.00.20.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 May 2012 00:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <05CF5750-D6EE-4271-88A7-4061E8F52631@gmail.com> From: Freeman Fang To: dev@camel.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20270088.m8JIX1mU5m@dilbert.dankulp.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-388631784 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Building the manual..... Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:20:00 +0800 References: <20270088.m8JIX1mU5m@dilbert.dankulp.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-5-388631784 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Freeman On 2012-5-17, at =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=889:39, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I've discovered that the manual building is what is causing the Camel > parallel builds to completely fail. If I do: > > $ mvn -Pfastinstall -P '!build.manual' -T 8 > > to turn that off, then the parallel build actually works. (when the > repository update stuff in the install plugin doesn't barf, separate =20= > issue) > That kind of brings up the question: should we build the manual by =20= > default? > Since it requires things like prince to be installed, it's really =20 > not that > useful "out of the box". I'm kind of wondering if it make sense to =20= > NOT > have it build by default, but have it built during certain profiles > (release, deploy, etc...). > > Thoughts? > > --=20 > Daniel Kulp > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > --------------------------------------------- Freeman Fang FuseSource Email:ffang@fusesource.com Web: fusesource.com Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042 --Apple-Mail-5-388631784--