Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chsnow123@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.173 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of chsnow123@gmail.com designates
 10.100.213.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.100.213.8;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F4B93FE.1080902@gmail.com>
References: <4F31490A.107@gmail.com>
	<1328709856193-5466569.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4F3285A7.4060801@gmail.com>
	<CALvzYd91jgWyDSYdYFn3etw_E4sipEVC7nUUiPKCWH6Kcf66+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F4B93FE.1080902@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:56:44 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAGWifGLd7iDzCE6q+UXj+JTwsXP2EjYdDb2e-UHRJVefpOmy_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.9.1 Release
From: chris snow <chsnow123@gmail.com>
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1f24a1722704b9f35117

--0016368e1f24a1722704b9f35117
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030 would be good :)

Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a fix
as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its lack
of proxy support.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we
> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok la=
st
> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one failure
> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway.
>
> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp
>
>
> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian M=FCller wrote:
>
>> Hello Hadrian!
>>
>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us?
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since
>>> then
>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention i=
s
>>> to
>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hangi=
ng
>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris.
>>>
>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, =
so
>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between =
80
>>> and 100.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi
>>>>
>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.=
1
>>>> as
>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding
>>>> the
>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x
>>>> release
>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release?
>>>>
>>>> Babak
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.****
>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-****Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<
>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**
>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/D=
ISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html>
>>>> >
>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>> Principal Software Architect
>>> Talend, Inc
>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>

--0016368e1f24a1722704b9f35117--