camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <r...@fusesource.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Camel and MongoDB
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:01:29 GMT
Hi

In my mind, camel-morphia and camel-mongodb would be different components.
Or perhaps the mongodb component could offer two modes of operation: raw
MongoDB and Morphia.

For a first embracement of MongoDB, it seems more natural to implement a
raw component which can handle at least the following MongoDB
operations: insert, findOne, count, findAll, query, mapReduce, getStats,
group, save, update, remove, updateMulti.

Then we can start thinking about Morphia.

Do you agree?

Regards,
Raúl.

On 4 January 2012 09:35, Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've used morphia a lot last year and I was very happy with it. However, I
> think that we should not base a mongodb component on that.
>
> I think that we need a pure camel-mongodb component and we could have a
> morphia dataformat or a separate morphia component.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>  Committer
> Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer
> *
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message