Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cschneider111@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender)
Sender: Christian Schneider <cschneider111@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <4EE099FA.5060806@die-schneider.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:05:30 +0100
From: Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
References: 
 <CAGB5yNmhcNHbnpmYLofZjNj4dyTK+JmHfz+WMUYHcZWS5Vax2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALTd4v8trPiSEB0yHoSMPTZM7PsOW5z8V9LdunAGwK86aCkQGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4EE07A0C.3030307@die-schneider.net> <4EE085AA.3030608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE085AA.3030608@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles.

So I think the focus on resources really makes the difference and I 
think it is more natural to think in resources for humans than in commands.

Christian

Am 08.12.2011 10:38, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> Hi,
>
> I prefer that we keep as command family name a short name. "camel" is 
> fine but "camel-route" or "camel-context" are too long. Imagine when 
> operating a project on a platform, the number of characters to be 
> typed on the keyboard. This has an impact which is not negligible.
>
> So why not using camel:lisr-routes, camel:list-contexts and their 
> shortcut clr, clc
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
> On 08/12/11 09:49, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>
>> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call 
>> list or start or stop.
>>
>> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the 
>> commands slightly different.
>>
>> Instead
>> camel:route-list
>> camel:context-list
>>
>> I propose to have:
>> camel-route:list
>> camel-context:list
>>
>> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan:
>>> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<claus.ibsen@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the 
>>>> commands.
>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> eg
>>>> camel:list-routes  -->  camel:route-list
>>> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we 
>>> could do
>>>
>>> shell camel:route
>>> list
>>> start foo
>>> stop bar
>>>
>>> etc
>>>
>>
>>


-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com