camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keith Babo (Updated) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-4256) Adding a EndpointConfiguration interface
Date Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:57:32 GMT


Keith Babo updated CAMEL-4256:

    Attachment: CAMEL-4256-2.patch

Submitting a patch which provides an implementation of createConfiguration() in DefaultComponent.
 Now DefaultEndpoint can ask the component to produce the configuration object vs. creating
it directly in DefaultEndpoint.
> Adding a EndpointConfiguration interface
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: CAMEL-4256
>                 URL:
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Hadrian Zbarcea
>            Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
>             Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0
>         Attachments: CAMEL-4256-2.patch, camel-4256.patch
> One of the key missing pieces from the API is the explicit concept of EndpointConfiguration.
We use URIs for that, ant that's great, but we don't have it in the API. Some components do
have an informal version though.
> I am proposing adding an EndpointConfiguration interface:
> {code}
> public interface EndpointConfiguration {
>   void fromUri(String uri);
>   String toUri();
> }
> {code}
> and maybe other methods, we could also use URI instead of string for pre-parsing. Same
as with other concepts the default implementation would be in impl and components would extend
that and add fields for configuration parameters. 
> This would solve problems related to URI uniqueness to a good extent as toUri() should
always place parameters in the same order. The Endpoint interface would change though.
> The main advantage would be that we can annotate parameters and use javax.validation
to specify if a field is @ProducerOnly, @ConsumerOnly for example, which may exclude them
from toUri() (yes, there are some impacts, the id uri would be different than the config uric).
We could annotate them with @Secret to indicate that at least the value should not appear
in clear in the uri, etc. We could also add an @Default("value"), allowing us to exclude from
the uri fields set on the default value (even if the filed was explicitly set) and so on.
> This would also make static validation possible unit testing configuration would be vastly
simplified and we could improve coverage. We can do it in an incremental way without a big
impact on existing components (especially outside camel) via changes in DefaultEndpoint. I
am working on a prototype, but feedback is highly appreciated.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message