Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4B4B777B for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 311 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 16:38:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 120 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 16:38:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 112 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2011 16:38:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:38:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.75.158.78] (HELO mail.liquid-reality.de) (62.75.158.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:38:29 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.101] (HSI-KBW-46-223-138-180.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [46.223.138.180]) by mail.liquid-reality.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5366535F9E for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E610678.9090909@die-schneider.net> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:38:16 +0200 From: Christian Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1164334 - in /camel/trunk/components: camel-cache/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component/cache/ camel-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/exec/ camel-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component/exec/ References: <20110902023612.AC2F32388A19@eris.apache.org> <4E60C9F8.9070404@gmail.com> <4E60DF21.7040401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How about adding a warning message for invalid URIs in 2.9.0 that tells people that such URIs will be invalid in camel 3? Christian Am 02.09.2011 17:57, schrieb Claus Ibsen: > Frankly people have been using Camel for 4.5 years with url's just > like that without any problems. > > I think its bad judgment to create JIRA tickets with "critical" bugs > and mark them as fix for 2.8.1 etc, > as if the sky is falling down on people. > > Instead as you write somewhere, it could be put as a goal for Camel > 3.0 to have URL validation more strict, > and to start throwing exception if the uris is not 100% according to that spec. > > But for 2.x that is 2+ years old and in light of this is how Camel has > been doing it since its birth, eg 4.5 years > then it would IMHO be better to keep it as is in 1.x/2.x and put up > for 3.0 roadmap instead. > > > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com