Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of development.rants@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110725185145.C8931B133C@webmail1.bravehost.com>
References: 
 <CAJE2epShfvWQEU2jaz4c+NviBS_GhvRTZgj6=2t5KBcTpooQJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110725185145.C8931B133C@webmail1.bravehost.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:15:35 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAJE2epRPHCW=j=tMjNMZhUWcujbDtwv7SZw_un_8-oBJV5+5FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tutorials for Apache Camel
From: devrant devrant <development.rants@gmail.com>
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Robert,

    Thanks for the note. I will explore Fuse IDE. I am not religiously
aligned to any particular IDE, but I prefer NetBeans because of the
issue I once faced when trying to run 32--bit version of eclipse on
Windows Vista x64, and that was scary experience. Anyway, they have
64-bit builds now, I believe, and I figured I don't need 64-bit IDE,
so it wasn't that bad.

    Anyway, I believe supporting multiple IDEs is a good idea to get
wide adoption for a particular project, which is why when I see lack
of NetBeans with Apache Camel article on Apache Camel, I jumped to
write a few articles for it.

    Honestly, Apache Camel is a really impressive framework, I have
never believe that you can achieve so much with so little coding.

Thanks.

Regards,
    Kok Hoor

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Robert J. Liguori <camel@gliesian.com> wrote:
> If you like Camel, you'll love the Fuse IDE for Camel:
>
> http://fusesource.com/products/fuse-ide-camel/
>
> Since you mentioned NetBeans, it made me think of it as it's
> Eclipse-based only at this time, but I would love to see Fuse provide a
> NetBeans version of it.
>
> -- Robert
> --
> Sincerely,
> Robert J. Liguori
> STG Technologies, Inc.
>