Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8CBE6FF9 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 02:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81784 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2011 02:09:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 81719 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2011 02:09:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 81710 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2011 02:09:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:09:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of willem.jiang@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:09:43 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so7260003iwn.32 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:09:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8cR4P50hr966kjvvHysFZNfCJrgd2mWBIzKCWR4LDS0=; b=JzSCTSLE87ZJsnPcDpQSE9fD2goKXKfNlDZ4E3oKIEze9AKqIcMnE+8vwluqdYQaGQ iK9/9Z6/S5bus/raSTudcOPCH+0QyB7sgpWY6uCaOVGy+/kWzG0YNAv68z5UVbSZTb0v hTDfn4y2Bw369p9lIggt9yqwfBNcjOuEp7DDY= Received: by 10.42.189.5 with SMTP id dc5mr5528622icb.356.1309918161849; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.158] ([125.34.5.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly7sm8219862icb.12.2011.07.05.19.09.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E13C3CA.7070601@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:09:14 +0800 From: Willem Jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Closing down for the 2.8.0 release References: <4DF0C0E5.8070806@gmail.com> <4E0C1BBA.3070801@nanthrax.net> <4E0D39FC.6000204@gmail.com> <4E128EF9.2040806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E128EF9.2040806@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Hadrian, I think we are ready for the Camel 2.8.0 release. But I'm not sure why you are still planing to do the patch release for the 2.7.x as we never do this kind small patch release unless it relates to a serious security issue before. Can we just let the people move on to Camel 2.8.0 instead of confusing about what's difference between the Camel 2.8.0 and Camel 2.7.3 ? On 7/5/11 12:11 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Karaf 2.2.2 is now available and Willem did the upgrade. I think we can > get ready to start the release. Are there any other issues that must go > into 2.8.0? > > I would also build a 2.7.3 at the same time, there are a few fixes and > improvements, including some around xmlsecurity. > > Thoughts? > Hadrian > > > On 06/30/2011 11:07 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just applied the patch into trunk. >> >> On 7/1/11 12:36 AM, Donald Whytock wrote: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3948 >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Donald Whytock >>> wrote: >>>> Just a reminder...CAMEL-3948 is marked as fixed, but the current trunk >>>> still needs my final patch. >>>> >>>> Don >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste >>>> Onofr� wrote: >>>>> Hi Claus, >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Karaf 2.2.2, I've released OPS4J dependencies yesterday. >>>>> Jamie >>>>> will cut off the release this afternoon. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 06/30/2011 08:31 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay the JIRA roadmap for Camel 2.8 seems good now. There is 2 open >>>>>> tickets. >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3774 >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4144 >>>>>> >>>>>> CAMEL-3774 is about generating the manual and is assigned to Hadrian. >>>>>> >>>>>> CAMEL-4144 is about upgrading to Karaf 2.2.2. That release is in >>>>>> progress. >>>>>> So by good chance we should be able to pickup that version when its >>>>>> released. >>>>>> Alternatively we can stick to Karaf 2.2.1 which works fine. >>>>>> (CAMEL-4144 is about some maven validate goal that would require >>>>>> Karaf >>>>>> 2.2.2 to pickup a fix in Karaf, but running Camel in Karaf is >>>>>> absolutely fine) >>>>>> >>>>>> The CI servers also seems good. Although they tend to run out of >>>>>> memory at the end, such as when testing the examples. But those are >>>>>> the last piece of the build, and thus all components tests fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest that when Karaf 2.2.2 is out we git it a few spins on >>>>>> the CI >>>>>> servers and then start cutting the Camel 2.8 release. Would be >>>>>> good to >>>>>> get it out before the summer vacation starts. As well its more than 3 >>>>>> months since Camel 2.7 was released. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Claus Ibsen >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Okay we should really start focusing on getting the last tickets >>>>>>> which >>>>>>> has been assigned for 2.8 release done now. >>>>>>> There is about 350 tickets on the roadmap, so its going to be the >>>>>>> biggest release, since 2.0 went GA. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So please take a look at your assigned tickets and get them done, or >>>>>>> move them for 2.9. >>>>>>> Then keep eyes on CI servers and help fix any test failures, so we >>>>>>> have green builds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The summer vacation period is approaching so we should IMHO get the >>>>>>> 2.8 release out early next month if possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would propose starting to close down and prepare for the 2.8.0 >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> 2-3 weeks. There are already 282 issues for 2.8.0 and chances are >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> over 300 by the release time, probably setting a new record. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As of now there are 17 issues unresolved, a few of them almost >>>>>>>> done, so >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> next week I assume there'll be significantly less. I would suggest >>>>>>>> shifting >>>>>>>> the focus from adding new features to stabilizing the build. If >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> any issues you know of that you think absolutely must be in 2.8.0 >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> shout and ask for help if needed (especially non committers >>>>>>>> subscribing >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> this list). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>> FuseSource >>>>>>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com >>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>>>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews >>>>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > -- Willem ---------------------------------- FuseSource Web: http://www.fusesource.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: willemjiang