camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Müller <christian.muel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] - Camel 2.9 - JMX and reducing Spring depdendency
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:38:23 GMT
+1
I also think it's a good idea. Let me know if you would like to distribute
the work...

Best,
Christian

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Now that Camel 2.8 is getting close to being released. Its in vote.
>
> I took a bit time to writeup a design note about some goals for Camel 2.9.
> At first it please go read this wiki page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+2.9+-+JMX+and+reducing+Spring+dependency
>
> One of the reason I think this is a good idea is that Apache Camel is
> such a versatile project, being used in any kind of environment out
> there.
> We have end users who are keen on using JEE standards with CDI and
> whatnot. And they are most likely not using Spring Framework as JEE
> offers similar servies.
>
> Likewise OSGi blueprint is being a very compelling alternative to
> spring-dm in the world of OSGi.
>
> And another reason is to keep Camel lightweight. So being able to
> reduce the runtime JARs to
> only camel-core + slf4j API means we are as light as we can get.
> Currently you need 8+ Spring JARs just to enable and use JMX which is
> way overkill.
>
> And yes it will be full backwards compatible, so people can keep on
> using the Spring JMX annotations if they like.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message