Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82CF349C3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49649 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 10:20:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 49606 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 10:20:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 49598 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 10:20:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:20:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of janstey@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vx0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:19:56 +0000 Received: by vxc11 with SMTP id 11so1548286vxc.32 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tKsr9UVhJ8M0uDjMykVWJm+p49kraa1YicB2fhO7b8w=; b=SIfJU+XWGJRaUuvqOl9yBo8hVeYx3eBhVen2bbmvpDlBWPgYJ+4wr+cn4VMpxlSURX FYklyr1leRGAKXDQZWYdscFwWr4qWhnhyG87NTUOCJbWKOopRmhUZKuTc/INURcUncPl jYHBV2lNDi913IwXFq+/hxQHNhZFLVDQ/6iwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WNOoAz48dAG9V/FJMeWck1uOeUx97WHbHkZNFLsS4emo9DwxL+2V8j5eK6+5crb0ql IKHQciNiIPjX5piRuu+ms/ta/tlBj8ZV+kHXycMIIUC9kCr47ykccHIIf4wdwi33hWRi iBaVw/I1f8ypJdv7jQuse3RI9RmzyWytHA9AA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.94.50 with SMTP id cz18mr2337094vdb.299.1308824375281; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.181.137 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:19:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1908944.uLskyJmmtD@dilbert.dankulp.com> <1859410.mhMMkScefV@dilbert.dankulp.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: source distributions.... From: Jon Anstey To: dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec50162c7f6467204a65e6ba7 --bcaec50162c7f6467204a65e6ba7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 for a single source disto. Though maybe we could have a zip file instead of the tgz? Not sure if Windows can handle tgz OOTB. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Kettelerij < richardkettelerij@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm fine with this, one source archive should be enough. Like Donald said > most IDE's can handle both file types (although .zip is more common). > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Claus Ibsen > wrote: > > > +1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long > time > > :) > > > > I wonder if we need to build -javadoc JARs (if we do that) ? > > Do people use them? Don't your IDE grab the javadoc from the -src JARs? > > > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > FuseSource > > Email: cibsen@fusesource.com > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > > > -- Cheers, Jon --------------- FuseSource Email: jon@fusesource.com Web: fusesource.com Twitter: jon_anstey Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen --bcaec50162c7f6467204a65e6ba7--