Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of seijoed@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=JBOLWUUkv5CRM9HjRWR+097hwbPyYkhTKC2hIXFFkwoOxPo8ROlEa/0dYKVft2R9JB
         AADKV5buz0AZdJXWBpDfrS9orKEvMsFGrQ5wvPvpQAEoRIuoMtB43QmeohJQlu7Sc9mD
         6Gb5IL/nhSh9Avo99/c2902L/zUH3fEkQtN3A=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: [PROPSAL] Release Camel 2.7.1
From: Johan Edstrom <seijoed@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F5858F3-9803-42B4-91DB-96A46F736B1A@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:55:25 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <429AEF4A-504E-4D37-A5B6-2B0D133AE6A0@gmail.com>
References: <0439AD71-907D-4BD8-8AAF-6EC9F6E5DA4F@gmail.com>
 <4D99D4C1.8040008@die-schneider.net> <4D99D48A.8020906@nanthrax.net>
 <4D99D671.5010901@die-schneider.net>
 <0860BED2-5141-499E-A24D-AF483A20B121@gmail.com>
 <3FFFFE3A-E4FF-43D1-BB67-551B44854AE0@gmail.com>
 <273C4E51-9C08-401E-BA23-31E9130D0F7C@gmail.com>
 <341C499A-71E9-4104-AE6E-80A42CF7B76E@gmail.com>
 <3F5858F3-9803-42B4-91DB-96A46F736B1A@gmail.com>
To: dev@camel.apache.org

Major +1 on this!


On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:

> This probably means that we can release camel-2.7.1 before cxf-2.4.0 =
is out. Maybe you guys can make the cxf community aware of the camel =
changes (well, I guess I could do that too), so that they have a chance =
to test.
>=20
> I will create a branch off of the camel-2.7.0 tag, start applying =
patches and release a snapshot. This way we can not only decide what =
patches to put in 2.7.1, but it won't slow down development on trunk. If =
you prefer it another way, please shout.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>=20
>=20
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>=20
>> If cxf:endpoint is tested as is against 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT, i.e the =
spring code, we should be home-free.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>=20
>>> We need to make sure camel-cxf works with both 2.3.x and 2.4.x, =
correct?
>>> Hadrian
>>>=20
>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> 2.4.3 will need some api changes on in/out interceptors.
>>>> Otherwise an upgrade is  pretty easy.
>>>>=20
>>>> Also 2.4 is going to contain plenty more BP stuff.
>>>> That features file just started working 3 days ago.
>>>>=20
>>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Christian, can we get some sort of commitment from the cxf =
community that cxf 2.4.x will be backwards compatible with 2.3.x? I saw =
that you made the following change on trunk:=20
>>>>> org.apache.cxf.*;version=3D"[2.3.2,2.5)"
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Are there any other dependencies we need to upgrade?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Yes we need a new camel release to be compatible with cxf 2.4. =
The question is only if we can also do something with the feature file =
to make it compatible with cxf 2.3 and 2.4.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9:
>>>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I guess that the camel-cxf POM should be also updated to update =
the CXF version range.
>>>>>>> So we need a new Camel release for that, no ?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On 04/04/2011 04:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>> What do we do with the karaf feature file?
>>>>>>>> The camel-cxf features are not suitable for cxf 2.4. On the =
other hand
>>>>>>>> CXF 2.4 brings it=B4s own feature file. So if the cxf feature =
is installed
>>>>>>>> camel-cxf can just be installed.
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:20, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> There are a few dependencies that are used with camel that we =
don't
>>>>>>>>> support as mentioned on the SMX mailing list and CAMEL-3830.
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> I think we should support at least:
>>>>>>>>> * slf4j 1.6.x
>>>>>>>>> * jetty 7.3.1.v20110307
>>>>>>>>> * cxf 2.4.x
>>>>>>>>> * (if you know of other dependencies that should be upgraded, =
please
>>>>>>>>> comment)
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> ... and issue a camel-2.7.1 asap. Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> --=20
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20