Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81159 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2011 00:04:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2011 00:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 80022 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2011 00:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 79992 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2011 00:04:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 79984 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2011 00:04:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:04:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.45] (HELO mail-fx0-f45.google.com) (209.85.161.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:04:06 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so4479837fxm.32 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:03:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=N3Ckq9BKlUDl6bEqfDORBn07stmdfznhkx6QtRe8gyg=; b=NZ7bpeY/kZKdnJ8kTrV13adMvFNW3omU+/7Ek7cTp4UTlxD+WTBJkeaXN8qVNhnPUw mUR6zK6n824OslzLIF1o5I6cRiIQjncwOsLCTU3LfYVl1mwEE0aHppR/ZSwBgzHzKtA5 6b/9e4FpxSelOp+6OxBgNtEVmLK3GzAbG9qJY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=smr1FTrmeiEdPd/4M7T7UZ/D8nPCmJj9GCPrGs1i/HzXm16p5ZDAr1QJDvd8hZc8YM /Nph2xYSqQKSZqyCdwATFihNcqwBGjMH86PC3CL+Dsa9ixUc5SEDE6Gzh1fVSa+R8qXB WMc2Xjk2gQxCcmU192ydhR8Iwe0b5RR6f/f6I= Received: by 10.223.71.195 with SMTP id i3mr1763884faj.149.1298073826364; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:03:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.165] (host86-164-75-18.range86-164.btcentralplus.com [86.164.75.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j12sm1363577fax.9.2011.02.18.16.03.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:03:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Early Camel 2.7 release From: Rob Davies In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:03:41 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A1C635A-B16B-40F5-B91F-2AEB361C6DD7@gmail.com> References: To: dev@camel.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 18 Feb 2011, at 12:19, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi >=20 > Now that the major migration efforts for Camel 2.7 is in-house > (JDK1.6,spring3,slf4j, etc.). and the fact that we did this really > fast. > Thanks everyone. >=20 > I would like to propose that we consider doing an earlier release of > Camel 2.7, then the usual 3 months release cycle. > The reason is I would like people to give the community the chance to > take and upgrade their Camel applications to Camel 2.7. > And then report back if there was any issues doing so. >=20 > By having a shorter release cycle then the release is focused about > those changes, and not the usual bunch of 300 JIRA tickets resolved. > So if there is something that makes upgrading 2.x -> 2.7 problematic > or impossible, then we have a better chance to catch this earlier. >=20 > Then the Camel 2.8 release can follow and be released at the usual = timeframe. >=20 > I propose to > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > - Release Camel 2.7 at the end of this month > - Release Camel 2.8 at the usual time, which would be in mid / end of = April. >=20 > You thoughts? >=20 >=20 > And are there any tickets which is a must have for a Camel 2.7 = release? >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cibsen@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/