Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <3478403.38691293503505997.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:31:45 -0500 (EST)
From: "Pablo Herrero (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (CAMEL-3344) RedeliveryPolicy does not honor
 MaximumRedeliveryDelay
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Pablo Herrero updated CAMEL-3344:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: RedeliveryPolicyMaxDelayTest.java

I ran into this issue too (just now, so I searched the JIRA queue to avoid duplicating this report). I'm attaching the unit test I wrote for it.

> RedeliveryPolicy does not honor MaximumRedeliveryDelay
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-3344
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3344
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Lorrin Nelson
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: RedeliveryPolicyMaxDelayTest.java
>
>
> When using exponential retry back-off with a maximumRedeliveryDelay, the delay is not honored.
> The bug is in RedeliveryPolicy.java's calculateRedeliveryDelay method:
>         if (maximumRedeliveryDelay > 0 && redeliveryDelay > maximumRedeliveryDelay) {
>             redeliveryDelayResult = maximumRedeliveryDelay;
>         }
> redeliveryDelay is the initial delay and never increases, so the max is never applied. It needs to compare against redeliveryDelayResult instead.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.