Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28405 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 12:33:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 12:33:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 82818 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 12:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 82744 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 12:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 82506 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 12:33:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:33:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:33:14 +0000 Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so1304982vws.32 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e6rKTtKpZ4FQ6tuUvEK6XrJGU1mZyQtfw0Q/nw8zhpI=; b=tI9UPWrDmDMInlb5v5hTvslP6sKAW6HRsr0mAvpDmgOFlov+6jWFEViy7bo0DOJ8aY 53lAiPl/5ff8z5P7kCb9ks1XYlolxi7L2bwEXMxByC09sJm5yOKVk/kejpf1B5Hob9Bc 7YWPPdOwc7pIlohWURp3sWLgc41/bRgYMD3q0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=v47aE5B8izavKIxjhYMhmZUDB3ENTNKo5lbj/mmoB3zLATgoS4yNBJGx0LnD/7npqP l/f6dzEBUU6uk2t3k7E83kTthrifl1LWa9GyZkuP1XzJYTKQZPn1aTDwhvJDxymZXzYT r00PiGp6wPLCOYb5qzHqd5Ba6vi69+3hVBvU0= Received: by 10.224.200.9 with SMTP id eu9mr3365971qab.109.1287491573477; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:32:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.13.168 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:32:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0E608B3AEB71BF429396A5AF065ED05D09DB2986D5@S3Q2173.enbw.net> References: <8FF22BE7-397C-4670-8DFE-C7566CC27F45@gmail.com> <1287415478332-3217639.post@n5.nabble.com>

<9CDD183E-63FF-4944-9826-BD85F73377B2@gmail.com> <0E608B3AEB71BF429396A5AF065ED05D09DB2986D5@S3Q2173.enbw.net> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:32:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.5.0 To: dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Schneider Christian wrote: > How about the problem with the examples? I copy the content from my mail = here as it was a spearate thread. > --- > I just downloaded the apache-camel-2.5.0.zip. > > The examples directory looks strange. There are a lot of files with exten= sion "..formatted". I do not think the belong there. As the example= s are very important for the users I think we should correct this. I am not= sure if this is a blocker though so I avoid voting at the moment. > > --- > Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9 responded with an idea how to fix the problem: > > Hi, > > the .formatted extension comes from a bug in maven-assembly-plugin > beta5 (I had the same in ServiceMix). > I downgraded to maven-assembly-plugin beta4 (not tried with assembly 2.2 > just released). > I wonder what the community think? I tried the 2.2 assembly and it created a ZIP file on my laptop without the numbers. But I wonder if something happens afterwards when Hadrian does the release process, which could cause the numbers to appear, if he also uses the 2.2 version? Of course it would be nice with a release without those numbers, but its not a blocker IMHO. We can of course note this in the release notes. So do we want a quicker release, or should we send beers to Hadrian and ask him to redo the release? Then we could pickup the minor commits done since. Or redo based on the tag= ? Thoughts? > Regards > JB > ----- > > > Thanks > > Christian > > > Christian Schneider > Informationsverarbeitung > Business Solutions > Handel und Dispatching > > Tel : +49-(0)721-63-15482 > > EnBW Systeme Infrastruktur Support GmbH > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Karlsruhe > Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mannheim =AD HRB 108550 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Bernhard Beck > Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Jochen Adenau, Hans-G=FCnther Meier > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2010 03:54 > An: dev@camel.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.5.0 > > No, the artifacts are there, I can access them: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-001/org= /apache/camel/apache-camel/2.5.0/ > > Hadrian > > On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Christian M=FCller wrote: > >> Hello Hadrian! >> >> I cannot download the artifacts from the staging repository, because I >> receive a "Bad Gateway". Do you canceled the vote already? >> >> Regards, >> Christian > > --=20 Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus