Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38553 invoked from network); 6 May 2010 06:10:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 May 2010 06:10:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7771 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2010 06:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 7746 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2010 06:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 7738 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2010 06:10:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 06:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.173] (HELO mail-wy0-f173.google.com) (74.125.82.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 06:10:02 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so3308087wyj.32 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 23:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+Qe7a3SnVjB2Ja+nuU6GuSNZ4LE2XptZxSoHdChsKmA=; b=xEq8jCwCUjFY9IxFnoNJxSH7aQDGbZ/EoM6jn0Mul1SJU11Iu8EMEFCPjBTCjgpGs/ Pbkafrl3U9UD0ugNPyDKmTKcKG59nXtiP2F5AbhSJ8dirzZVZBGL7jreY36zFwot4PwN EjAZ8QAvMz8cg0XZpeQF0B4Pj3yfqS29ELHKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=amQU1ounypKgqMvocbtNNk2ZrdfVbBczrP14Vao53Iq2tl2Krkq8hm4BXFehmY/Qvg 4rtKvydD1bNpPKYaAd1r607sMbW8R/5vRFM/TpD9LQwwc5+ZqPvOHi+exi6JAEBCzG/i ZIE1kpk8Z1KdtHr+R9I4ontX8uAsTZU7piBVM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.143 with SMTP id y15mr5023742wee.104.1273126182110; Wed, 05 May 2010 23:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.73.73 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 23:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BE19CB1.3050308@die-schneider.net> <4BE19E40.1020701@gmail.com> <4BE20D44.7090707@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:09:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Camel 2.3 - Last call From: Guillaume Nodet To: dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77e32d6c5c00485e6c90f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d77e32d6c5c00485e6c90f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'd like to try to tackle CAMEL-2693 if we have a bit of time. I think should be done by tomorrow. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 06:07, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Yeah lets wait for CXF 2.2.8. I assume it doesn't break anything else? > Maybe someone could try testing camel-cxf with CXF 2.2.8-SNAPSHOT. > > So when 2.2.8 is out we can upgrade without any issues which otherwise > could cause a delay in the Camel release. > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Willem Jiang > wrote: > > There is a CXF related issue[1] need CXF 2.2.8. > > It could be great if we release Camel 2.2.3 after CXF 2.2.8. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2614 > > > > Willem > > William Tam wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On 05/05/2010 12:28 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Claus, > >>> > >>> one interesting thing could be to wait for CXF 2.2.8 and use this. Dan > >>> just proposed a release next week. So it is just a matter of days. > >>> Apart from this I am really looking forward to the new release the > sooner > >>> the better. > >>> > >>> Greetings > >>> > >>> Christian > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 05.05.2010 12:37, schrieb Claus Ibsen: > >>>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I think its time we get Apache Camel 2.3.0 out of the door. > >>>> So this is just a heads up if you have any critical last minute issues > >>>> you want to be addressed. > >>>> > >>>> New features or major improvements should be scheduled for 2.4. > >>>> > >>>> All dependencies is also using a stable release which should be avail > >>>> in public maven repos. > >>>> So we should be good to go. > >>>> > >>>> And I believe the Apache infrastructure is coming back to life after > >>>> the recent attack last month. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com --0016e6d77e32d6c5c00485e6c90f--