camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2249) Wrong handling of useMessageIDAsCorrelationID
Date Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:43:20 GMT


Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2249:

SI is also discussing a similar issue at their forum

> Wrong handling of useMessageIDAsCorrelationID
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CAMEL-2249
>                 URL:
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>         Attachments: camel-jms-correlation.patch
> Camel jms seems to contain two bug in correlation id handling.
> The first shows when you have a sender that has UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="false" and
a server that has UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true". If you send a message with correlationId="a"
then the response message will contain correlationId="<request message id>". Even if
this could be a valid behaviour as you wanted UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true" I donĀ“t
think it makes sense as the sender will not be able to correlate the message. So for this
case I propose to only set the correlation id to the request message id on the server if the
correlation id of the request was not set.
> The second bug seems to hide the first bug. Perhaps someone found a quick (and wrong
way to make the tests work). It shows when you set UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true" on both
client and server. If you send a message with correlation id = "a" the client sends it out
with this correlation id. The server then sets the correlation id to the request message id
(first bug). Then on the client the reply is received. After that the correlation id is set
back to "a" on the client. So the tests think all is well. This part of the code should be
> I have marked both problems in the code with FIXME markers in my patch. I can also provide
a patch with the solution but first I wanted to only show the problem and provide a failing
> Hope my explanations were not to confused ;-)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message