camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Schneider (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2249) Wrong handling of useMessageIDAsCorrelationID
Date Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:20:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56775#action_56775
] 

Christian Schneider commented on CAMEL-2249:
--------------------------------------------

Are there any news about this issue? We still have the incompatibility between CXF / Camel
and pure CXF. I can help some more by providing a complete patch with a solution. It would
help me though if we could discuss how the "useMessageIdAsCorrelationId" feature should behave
before I do the coding.

Especially I need to know if the correlation id of the incoming message should be used as
correlation id in the reply instead of the messageId if it is set.


> Wrong handling of useMessageIDAsCorrelationID
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-2249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2249
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>         Attachments: camel-jms-correlation.patch
>
>
> Camel jms seems to contain two bug in correlation id handling.
> The first shows when you have a sender that has UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="false" and
a server that has UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true". If you send a message with correlationId="a"
then the response message will contain correlationId="<request message id>". Even if
this could be a valid behaviour as you wanted UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true" I donĀ“t
think it makes sense as the sender will not be able to correlate the message. So for this
case I propose to only set the correlation id to the request message id on the server if the
correlation id of the request was not set.
> The second bug seems to hide the first bug. Perhaps someone found a quick (and wrong
way to make the tests work). It shows when you set UseMessageIDAsCorrelationID="true" on both
client and server. If you send a message with correlation id = "a" the client sends it out
with this correlation id. The server then sets the correlation id to the request message id
(first bug). Then on the client the reply is received. After that the correlation id is set
back to "a" on the client. So the tests think all is well. This part of the code should be
removed.
> I have marked both problems in the code with FIXME markers in my patch. I can also provide
a patch with the solution but first I wanted to only show the problem and provide a failing
test. 
> Hope my explanations were not to confused ;-)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message