camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ashwin Karpe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (CAMEL-1472) Lucene Component
Date Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:19:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56672#action_56672
] 

Ashwin Karpe edited comment on CAMEL-1472 at 12/28/09 3:19 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Claus,

It should definitely be possible to do that... The only question I have is philosophical as
to whether it is ok to do so. The differences between components and processors is rather
academic in that components represent endpoints and processors don't... Technically I do not
see any reason why the Lucene component itself could not do more.

If you would like me to implement the Query Processor in this fashion I would be happy to
do so. I would have preferred a DSL associated processor way, but givent that it requires
changes in camel-core and creates unnecessary dependencies and bloat, I avoided this approach.
In the absence of that the command on the URI is quite elegant. The Component now has to do
a teeny bit more in dealing with the configuration.

Please let me know.

Cheers,

Ashwin... 

      was (Author: akarpe):
    Hi Claus,

It should definitely be possible to do that... The only question I have is philosophical as
to whether it is ok to do so. The differences between components and processors is rather
academic in that components represent endpoints and processors don't... Technically I do not
see any reason why the Lucene component itself could not do more.

If you would like me to implement the Query Processor in this fashion I would be happy to
do so. I would have preferred a DSL associated processor way, but givent that it requires
changes in camel-core and creates unnecessary dependencies and bloat. Hence I avoided this
approach. in the absence of that the command on the URI is quite elegant. The Component now
has to do a teeny bit more in dealing with the configuration.

Please let me know.

Cheers,

Ashwin... 
  
> Lucene Component
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1472
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Ashwin Karpe
>             Fix For: Future
>
>         Attachments: camel-lucene-20091227.patch, camel-lucene.zip
>
>
> We should add a new component for Apache Lucene integration

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message