camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-1900) Need to allow adding of model definitions and processors in camel components without involving the camel-core
Date Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:05:52 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-1900.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

Currently closing this one as to extend the DSL is something we may have to use scala or other
more advanced languages for.

Currently its not *on the roadmap* near term to work on this.

> Need to allow adding of model definitions and processors in camel components without
involving the camel-core
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1900
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-M3
>            Reporter: Ashwin Karpe
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> Please see the synopsis of my problem below...
> =================================================================================
> I recently submitted an camel-cache component based on Ehcache to the Apache Camel community
(CAMEL-1868). The component has an event based Cache consumer and a Cache Producer to write
to the cache.
>  
> I was planning on adding several processors that would do selective cache contents based
replacement at the payload/token/XPath level. I have the code written and working however,
I was planning on adding a nice model definition to bring it all together via DSL. This is
where I ran into a serious problem. The problem is the following
>  
>          a> The processors are in the cache component and I extended the base interface
processor and I can do the following in unit tests and it works.
>                     from("cache://TestCache1").
>                           filter(header("CACHE_KEY").isEqualTo("quote")).
>                           process (new CacheBasedTokenReplacer("cache://TestCache1","cache_key","##tag##")).
>                           to("direct:next");
>          b> I put together a CamelCacheDefinition class (see attached)
>                in the camel-cache component (not camel-core)
>                that uses package org.apache.camel.model.cache
>                and extends ProcessorDefinition<CacheProcessorDefinition> from package
org.apache.camel.model 
>          c> I would like the following effect                   
>                     from("cache://TestCache1").
>                           filter(header("CACHE_KEY").isEqualTo("quote")).
>                           applycachevalue("cache://TestCache1","cache_key","##tag##").
>                           to("direct:next");
>  
> The problem is that when I develop the unit test and try to do intellisense, I do not
see applycachevalue() against ProcessorDefinition (this part I understand, since it is not
seeing the CacheDefinition entry) since this capabilty comes from the processorDefinition
in came-core. What I am trying to see is 
>           a> How can I do this without having to modify the ProcessorDefinition in
camel-core and keep my CacheDefinition in the camel-cache component. 
>           b> I do not wish to add the ehCache dependency in the camel-core and bloat
the core. Also, the Producer and Consumer ehCache components are all related to the processors
and I would like to avoid fragmentation of the processors from the components.
>           b> If not and I do have to move the CacheDefinition into the camel-core,
can I still keep the processors in camel-cache component and intellisense without side-effects
( I suspect I can through the groups setup in camel-core but I need to verify)
>  
> ======================================================================================

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message