Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <646677152.1245859775414.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-1127) there seems some confusion &
 inconsistency in the use of CamelContext.addRoute[s]() with the interfaces
 Route / Routes / RouteBuilder
In-Reply-To: <923030094.1227878045405.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-1127.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

trunk: 788067.

The org.apache.camel.Routes interface have been renamed to org.apache.camel.RoutesBuilder and having a more precise and simpler interface.


> there seems some confusion & inconsistency in the use of CamelContext.addRoute[s]() with the interfaces Route / Routes / RouteBuilder
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1127
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1127
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> I wonder if some of them need deprecating or renaming to avoid confusion. There are various methods on CamelContext / SpringCamelContext with the names [set|add]Route[s] which are a bit confusing/messy.
> We should review all the methods and come up with a simpler solution

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.