Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34408 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 13:29:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 13:29:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 87191 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 13:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 87147 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 13:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 87137 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 13:29:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:29:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alloyer@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:29:16 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so94445wfa.11 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BKdzDHAvF23SrRQwjFo85uCgPE7pYuo3TWX5VI26IAE=; b=IAvmc9ZVJpzUKZ7/cdB9oFfuW77lP6JGlObp084BfwSzM+uFjADJGo8aoghTivQomj ca3qB3QnK1Xqy1K8xZy3nxzTBe3eHQj1lYOLHuY1zvZ+HdHwWlVjougV3mHLMIMVflwX gCHOTiNkW92p8n6W2wijhr3gIn3D5Aw5tsGIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZZDuRrxR6al5HIFuXKXGxwZ1tDZy1g9MFNKFW5E7cpbkEfqmSn6mbIItNIcuxm2zuI xhsCQwFzw0y5fdoecWNOCQILsKJ3AsiZDVDxC80hJ3Eb+09sHKGLm/aXrAjHOqJdt0Sb 7UJQXSuRPKHCKz2g/kGuXfcLZJ6HNXUnn8m2Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.178.9 with SMTP id a9mr468670wff.73.1239197335127; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:28:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <163BEE40-F59F-4AED-AACC-648518BE0E1F@gmail.com> References: <5db491290904060655l26ab5e34v6279eebe5223e36@mail.gmail.com> <163BEE40-F59F-4AED-AACC-648518BE0E1F@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:28:55 +0800 Message-ID: <5db491290904080628n7c88ac46ub9ec27d8933eac9d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which dynamic language should we add to extend the dynamic route ? From: =?GB2312?B?5bXRp8e/?= To: Hadrian Zbarcea , dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am more interested in Dynamic routes project! 2009/4/8 Hadrian Zbarcea : > I think we should start with Groovy, Python and Ruby. It's hard to decid= e > on priorities, every time I try to, I feel like changing the order. If y= ou > have a preference please let us know. After we get the AST it should be = all > the same. > > Btw, one of the first things we need to do is decide which of the 2 proje= cts > is of more interest to you so we would know how to rank it. > > You can find me (and others) online on the #camel channel at > irc.codehaus.org if you'd like to chat about it. > > Cheers > Hadrian > > > > > On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:55 AM, =E5=B5=D1=A7=C7=BF wrote: > >> I wonder which dynamic language should we add for the Dynamic route >> support,Groovy,Ruby,Python or Scala? >> Hope every one can give the opinion and we can negotiate to decide that. >> >> >> -- >> =E5=B5=D1=A7=C7=BF alloyer@gmail.com > > --=20 Xueqiang Mi