camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-316) Merge Fault and Exception semantics
Date Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:57:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=50984#action_50984
] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-316:
-----------------------------------

Hadrian, I think its very late, and unless the change have minimal impact on eg SMX then its
possible otherwise I would like to leave as is.

If we remove fault all together there is quite some code that depends on it, and how does
SMX handle this?

We are pushing the last must have for Camel 2.0 to get it done in due time, eg hopefully in
2-3 weeks.

> Merge Fault and Exception semantics
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-316
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-316
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hadrian Zbarcea
>            Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The fact that there are output/fault/exception could be confusing and clutter the dsl,
especially for components where there is no distinction between fault and exception.  We should
merge the two and simplify the model.
> See nabble thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/in-out-fault-messages-discussion-to14170013s22882.html#a14170013

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message