camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Camel 1.6/2.0 MINA UDP issue
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:27:25 GMT
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM, orton <o_huang@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What version of Camel and Mina are you using?
>>
>> I tried it out on the Camel 1.6 bin release and I compiled the Camel 2.0
>> snapshot in svn and both appeared to have the same problem... mina-core for
>> both appear to be 1.1.7
>>
>>> Mina is in the works of doing a Mina 2.0 that might be much better.
>>> When its release we will upgrade it in Camel 2.0 as well.
>>
>>> Yes the memory leaks is interresting? Where did you find them?
>>
>> I only saw some references in past forums and some of my co-workers have
>> mentioned them to me also, will look for more details and send to you
>>
>>> And whats the relevanse of you test? Sending 65.000 udp packages to
>>> yourself?
>>> Are you using Camel to be the Mina server as well? Or do you send it
>>> to another JVM?
>>
>> We're trying to do some simple stress and overhead testing on the Camel
>> components... We really like what you guys have done with it and find the
>> patterns extremely useful. We want to see how suitable it is for
>> applications with high throughput, low latency needs and what the extra cost
>> for using Camel is. I have separate servers in different VM's but on the
>> same host for now.
>>
>>
>>> Using TCP that works. Are you using the exact same sample but just
>>> change udp to tcp in the endpoint URI?
>>
>> I send the exact same samples with UDP and TCP... Just tried the multicast
>> one and it gives me the same issue as the UDP one...
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Have you seen my mails about commit a fix? Could you try again with a
> version of Camel that has the fix build.
>
> The problem would probably not manifest itself if you use 2 separate
> JVM's - 1 for server, 1 for client
Oh if you do NOT use the transferExchange=true option. eg if you send
regular payload with Camel 1.6.0.

But yet again would be nice if you try the comitted fix.


>
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-1.6-2.0-MINA-UDP-issue-tp22426433p22434032.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Development (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message