camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-1005) should we have an annotation - maybe @Handler or something which can mark a method as being the default method invoked by the Bean Binding if no other Camel annotations are used to bind parameters
Date Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:28:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=50533#action_50533
] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-1005:
------------------------------------

Yes better with a new one, but then we gotta come up with a good name and parameter, or just
name.

The purpose is to quickly being able to mark a method as the one Camel should invoke in a
class that might have many methods and thus it could be hard to pick the best one.
And to use annotations for meta data instead of specifying method=xxx in the Camel route?

Is @Handler the best name? Isnt it associated with all the web frameworks?

> should we have an annotation - maybe @Handler or something which can mark a method as
being the default method invoked by the Bean Binding if no other Camel annotations are used
to bind parameters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1005
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1005
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> e.g.
> {code}
> public class Cheese {
>   public void foo(String bar) {...}
>   @Handler
>   public void bar(String cheese) {...}
> {code}
> Then if we did
> {code}
> from("seda:foo").bean(Cheese.class);
> {code}
> it'd be obvious. 
> I guess its pretty low priority as follks could always do
> {code}
> public class Cheese {
>   public void foo(String bar) {...}
>   public void bar(@Body String cheese) {...}
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message