Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51969 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2009 16:12:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2009 16:12:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 60747 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 16:12:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 60667 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 16:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 60656 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2009 16:12:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:12:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of email.wtam@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.175] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:11:54 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so5060893wfc.11 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:11:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=woixWzme/o/IcEy29eZ4sJ4h8QyUa4pnRe3yWr37Uos=; b=ELIN5ZKdgGBgjR6UjhUbP3U0Qo9OLKHIWGsAa79IQV4U6mpIVvS2dC50KPDXcsT7OL 3Kg2FCum+26Q480sI6TrvkgTXvSPfry19hwteLTpqgxlcqJzkF2Aa5XQ4nu6BQzDj7v5 1MEl4n18p2FxEgH1eOJkgDClFi3rCTydeIucg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DMEJovh3V3zA0nDpI1OHgNuKL6aNykpbAY80DuZA5hLLfomZIm5OMm2WWYZTRZaPwY DjIwFRAhPOQeXpFEJ017/o+TP9lwxoPRINvc6elgV0Y8jJWYCW8+Uiff1BbtFR+Qsx4F yy3s2Y+WFk6326NbqYKGgrOxENqGGTjqrnZa0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.177.7 with SMTP id z7mr4434870wfe.59.1232727094446; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:11:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <509899e80901222315q6e74085ei2d1201ec01ef0cbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:11:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question : Naming conventions Abstract and Interfaces From: William Tam To: dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What about static Helper/Utils class? I notice both XxxHelper and XxxUtils names are used? On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > No particular one. We use Abstract* many times. For interfaces, just > something suggestive. > > Cheers > Hadrian > > On Jan 23, 2009, at 2:15 AM, Ramon Buckland wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> What is the naming comvention in use for Abstract and Interfaces. >> I am used to Abstract* .. and sometimes *Iface. >> >> What is camel's preference ? >> >> r. > >