Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 10739 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2009 20:20:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2009 20:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 14673 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2009 20:20:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14595 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2009 20:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14579 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2009 20:20:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:20:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:20:26 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64428234C47E for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:20:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925355164.1231273205405.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:20:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan Anstey (JIRA)" To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-984) Documentation - DeadLetterChannel - when error handling it's the original Exchange that is routed In-Reply-To: <1219834132.1223983432596.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48513#action_48513 ] Jonathan Anstey commented on CAMEL-984: --------------------------------------- Yeah, I like orchestrated. Sounds nice. But if you are worried about users getting confused with bpel/workflow terms, then maybe just "handled" is better? i.e. "...is enabled out-of-the-box and handled by Camel itself. The transaction type is handled by a backing system..." > Documentation - DeadLetterChannel - when error handling it's the original Exchange that is routed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-984 > Project: Apache Camel > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 1.4.0 > Reporter: Claus Ibsen > Assignee: Claus Ibsen > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Need to explain that when using non transacted error handler such as DLC then the Exchange that is sent to the error queue, or onException is the original one, not the one from inflight processing. > See nabble: > http://www.nabble.com/Error-Handler-and-OutHeaders-td19970966s22882.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.