camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Anstey (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-1099) File consumer should keep track of processed files
Date Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:12:05 GMT


Jonathan Anstey commented on CAMEL-1099:

Claus, I wouldn't spend too much time on the MemoryIdempotentRepository, I don't think many
users would want to use this in a production scenario (the file and jpa options are much more
attractive). The best we can do in this case is recommend the LRU cache option so the memory
doesn't get too out of hand I guess.

> File consumer should keep track of processed files
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CAMEL-1099
>                 URL:
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core, camel-ftp, camel-spring
>            Reporter: Jonathan Anstey
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
> See thread:
> Will be following Gert's suggestion of multiple implementations for the storage mechanism
so many use cases can be covered:
> - an in-memory store for testing purposes
> - a file-based implementation for basic production environments
> - a database- or ldap-backed implementation for clustered environments, where a file
can arrive through multiple directories

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message