camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ramon Buckland" <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] - Camel 2.0 - support # syntax in URI options
Date Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:46:28 GMT
> Good idea. But is this autowire used much in pure spring? Personally I
> have always used explicit wiring.

Yes, personally myself also. I have always considered it (potentially)
harmful, so perhaps it can be left off.

> Good catch. So if there is a String setter and NO bean in registry it
> should fallback to set the string?

Yes, something like that. I would figure ..

> We do have options that support multiple types such as an expression
> that can be string based and thus there is a setter that accepts a
> String.
> But we have overloaded the option with Expresison type as well. So we
> should be lenient on the String settable options ;)

 .. that as above, it is very implementation and current code specific as to
how it is done :-)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message