camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Willem Jiang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-372) JMS endpoints should default to be transactional; using the JMS transaction manager if no transaction manager is explicitly configured?
Date Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:05:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48339#action_48339
] 

Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-372:
------------------------------------

Since current JMS endpoint (for producer) don't know if the exchange it processed is InOnly
or InOut when it is created. 
And the exchange's exchange pattern can be changed any time in the route. I don't feel it
is right to set the transacted default value to be true.

> JMS endpoints should default to be transactional; using the JMS transaction manager if
no transaction manager is explicitly configured?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-372
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-372
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Its such a common use case - using camel-jms should be transactional out of the box unless
the user explicitly disables transactions. So defaulting the transactionManager property seems
to make sense

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message