camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Anstey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-1099) File consumer should keep track of processed files
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:04:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47780#action_47780
] 

Jonathan Anstey commented on CAMEL-1099:
----------------------------------------

So when there is a miss on the LRUCache, the file repository would be queried (and this is
the only case that it would queried)? I'm just wondering what kind of format we want for this
kinda file... having it appended to with every add seems to imply that it would be a big list
that we'd have to scroll through (very slow). Maybe I'm missing an obvious solution, it is
early here :)

> File consumer should keep track of processed files
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1099
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core, camel-ftp, camel-spring
>            Reporter: Jonathan Anstey
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> See thread: http://www.nabble.com/Deprecation-of-file-consumer-timestamp-td20566034s22882.html
> Will be following Gert's suggestion of multiple implementations for the storage mechanism
so many use cases can be covered:
> - an in-memory store for testing purposes
> - a file-based implementation for basic production environments
> - a database- or ldap-backed implementation for clustered environments, where a file
can arrive through multiple directories

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message