Mailing-List: contact camel-dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.170.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=hc8uU4lzzrLk9BwAAWO5i6Qbgb9IiY4wmFYajPUl8We7XLrC93i+0i6/NEWhgifALu
         jY9Crjea4LPkJLKqj/Cd+OSBQ625dwBgr3snM1P26zac56/oscXfwpu9uQ56QLKV998m
         /CMVHKi3P8Dpf6kPD0BZHZZ5fS0PP83vZEj3A=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0811060131h3cfac55fh30c7900429189460@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:31:42 +0000
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
In-Reply-To: <4C1FB9C00D24A140906239533638C4D205EC0692@EXVS04.exserver.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ec6e67fd0811060120i60c5262fxbf5eb5f6a44a6f6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4C1FB9C00D24A140906239533638C4D205EC0692@EXVS04.exserver.dk>

Sounds good!


2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk>:
> Hi
>
> I propose a work plan such as:
>
> You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with refactoring the =
API to remove the generics and get it as correct. You are the best people f=
or this work. Also very important that you guys look at the "remove unneede=
d copies of exchanges".
>
> Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could also he=
lp removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated. He has already d=
one some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd priority to find the gaps in th=
e spring DSL vs. Java DSL.
>
> I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation and my =
tutorial that I need to continue on part 5.
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsg=E5rdsv=E6nget 21
> 8362 H=F8rning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
> Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20
> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
>
> 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk>:
>> Hi
>>
>> Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on changing the=
 API.
>> - generics
>> - verbs for DSL
>> - remove @deprecated stuff
>>
>> And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every 3rd mo=
nth.
>
> Yeah!  I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff
> that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get Camel
> when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router.
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
>


--=20
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/