camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Moving Camel to TLP ?
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:19:41 GMT
+1.  Before 2.0 is definitely the right time.

Hadrian


On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> Yes, I agree, that before 2.0 would be good.
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Snyder  
> <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>  
>> wrote:
>>> I think Camel has a good and diverse self sustaining community and
>>> that it should aim to be a TLP now.
>>> Being a subproject of ActiveMQ is no more relevant imho.
>>> So I'd like to start writing a proposal that would be submitted to  
>>> the board.
>>> We would have to come with a project charter, decide what the PMC  
>>> list
>>> will be and find a PMC chair.
>>> Help and feedback welcomed !
>>
>> I have been pondering this for a while as well. I think it would be a
>> very good move for Camel since it's applicable to far more than just
>> ActiveMQ. One of the first questions I receive when I speak about
>> Camel is why it is a subproject of ActivMQ and my response is simply
>> that that's where the project began. I would definitely +1 such a
>> move, but the question is should we do it now or wait for the 2.0
>> release? I think such a move should take place before the 2.0  
>> release.
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\! 
>> G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>> );'
>>
>> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
>> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
>> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
>>
>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com


Mime
View raw message