camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Willem Jiang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-64) Camel DSL should use verbs for it's EIP actions.
Date Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:10:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47324#action_47324
] 

Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-64:
-----------------------------------

@Claus
Yes, It is painful and we can't support old spring xsd at the same time. So I suggest we don't
tough the Spring DSL.
@ALL
 I just went through the ProcessorType and Spring configuration. Now we are using the noun
as the processor name, the methods which create the processor types are using the noun for
the EIP actions. In these case we can think we just put the processor in the middle of the
routing rule, and the processor will take care of the more detail EIP verb action.
So I don't will to use verbs for the EIP actions in Camel DSL.

Any thoughts?

Willem

> Camel DSL should use verbs for it's EIP actions. 
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-64
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-64
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> For example splitter() should be split() and resequencer should be resequence.
> Old methods should be deprecated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message