camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jon Anstey" <jans...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:49:32 GMT
Sounds great guys. The less time we have to spend maintaining fixes
branches, the better.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Oh Willem wanted to do the verbs. Well he and Jonathan can get it sorted.
> Willem could also continue doing his important work on camel-cxf.
>
> Hadrian I doubt we have time to do anything for Camel 2.0.0 about your
> great ideas of having the DSL auto generated. This is something for the
> future such as Camel 3.0. 2.0 needs the API fixed and improved performance
> without all the copying. And then better camel-jbi integration as well.
>
> So I guess we should let Willem and Jonathan have green lights for DSL
> renaming.
>
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
> Sent: 6. november 2008 10:32
> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
>
> Sounds good!
>
>
> 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk>:
> > Hi
> >
> > I propose a work plan such as:
> >
> > You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with refactoring the
> API to remove the generics and get it as correct. You are the best people
> for this work. Also very important that you guys look at the "remove
> unneeded copies of exchanges".
> >
> > Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could also
> help removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated. He has already
> done some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd priority to find the gaps in
> the spring DSL vs. Java DSL.
> >
> > I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation and my
> tutorial that I need to continue on part 5.
> >
> >
> > Med venlig hilsen
> >
> > Claus Ibsen
> > ......................................
> > Silverbullet
> > Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> > 8362 Hørning
> > Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> > Web: www.silverbullet.dk
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20
> > To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
> >
> > 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk>:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on changing the
> API.
> >> - generics
> >> - verbs for DSL
> >> - remove @deprecated stuff
> >>
> >> And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every 3rd
> month.
> >
> > Yeah!  I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff
> > that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get Camel
> > when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router.
> >
> >
> > --
> > James
> > -------
> > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Open Source Integration
> > http://fusesource.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Jon

http://janstey.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message