Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 85258 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2008 04:09:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2008 04:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 31451 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2008 04:09:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 31426 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2008 04:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 31415 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2008 04:09:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:09:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:08:43 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C327234C131 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <742705871.1212725340297.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:09:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-578) JMX Instrumentation - PerformanceCounter - last processed timestamp In-Reply-To: <1226324125.1212605700272.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43276#action_43276 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-578: ----------------------------------- William. At first glance the nano second timing value doesn't give me good indication if the elapsed time is fast or not - we are so used to milli seconds. Can you create a patch that uses millis instead? And I do think the text in the jconsole should display the unit of the timing MinProcessingTime [millis] MeanProcessingTime [millis] MaxProcessingTime [millis] > JMX Instrumentation - PerformanceCounter - last processed timestamp > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-578 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-578 > Project: Apache Camel > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: camel-core > Affects Versions: 1.3.0 > Reporter: Claus Ibsen > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.4.0 > > Attachments: jconsole.PNG, jconsole_nanosecond.PNG, nanosecnd-patch.txt, patch.txt > > > Add a timestamp for the last completed exchange on the Camel JMX PerfformanceCounter. > Its very nice to be able to see this information in the JMX console. > And maybe add a first processed timestamp as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.