camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Camel 1.4 release
Date Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:33:21 GMT
Hi,

I just checked the kit, we do not include the camel-spring-integration 
and camel-scala into the java bin release kits.
I will commit a patch for it.

Willem.

Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find a first release candidate of apache-camel-1.4.0 here:
> http://people.apache.org/~hadrian/apache-camel-1.4.0-RC1/maven2/
>
> Most notable are the new Spring Integration support, improvements in 
> camel-scala and other components, architecture cleanup and quite a few 
> bug fixes.  Many thanks to Claus for starting a release note draft 
> here: 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+1.4.0+Release.
>
> Please play with it and let's close down any issues we may spot.  If 
> you know of issues that you thing must go in this release please let 
> us know (thanks to those who did that already).  I hope will be able 
> to do a final release this month.
>
> Cheers
> Hadrian
>
> PS.  I'll be out in the mountains for a week, not sure if i'll have 
> connectivity over there.
>
>
> On Jun 6, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing.  This is
>> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
>> I'll try to have a look next week.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Claus Ibsen <ci@silverbullet.dk> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Yep would be great with a 1.4 release before the summer or at least 
>>> one on the way.
>>>
>>> We should rather release often than only 1 or 2 pr. year. At least 
>>> now that some many activates is happening around Camel and we 
>>> add/fix quite a lot of stuff - even though the roadmap is a bit fuzzy.
>>>
>>> Move tickets
>>> ============
>>> I would suggest that we should start moving issues to 1.5/2.0 so the 
>>> roadmap for 1.4 is manageable to fix in a short time.
>>>
>>> I would like to give it a go, and move bigger issues for 2.0, such 
>>> as the new DSL languages and other more exotic features - please 
>>> feel free to move issues as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Must have
>>> ==========
>>> The must have features is for my point of view that we gave the 
>>> "interceptor" issue a go. Hadrian you have a few tickets on this. 
>>> Anything I can help with? In special cases you end up with 
>>> duplicated messages and this is a blocker issue.
>>>
>>> And then we have the issues with resource/classloading in OSGi 
>>> environments. Freeman Fang would try to provide a patch. Anyone can 
>>> help him? Maybe more of the good people from ServiceMix?
>>>
>>> And we have one unit test failing on ActiveMQ 5.1.0 that worked in 
>>> 5.0.0 - its some of the advanced stuff we got some patches for 
>>> recently.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> ......................................
>>> Silverbullet
>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>> 8362 Hørning
>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 6. juni 2008 14:55
>>> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
>>> Subject: Camel 1.4 release
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
>>> fixes and improvements.  I believe it's time to start thinking about a
>>> 1.4 release.  If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
>>> us to check out.  Please let us know what other issues you think
>>> should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>


Mime
View raw message