camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: a few comments on SedaComponent
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:31:43 GMT
What about using vm:// and using a flag instead of a different
protocol to control the fact that the queue is global (currently,
vm:// is the same as seda, but queues are global in the jvm) ?
Else, I guess memory-queue:// will do it.

On 10/9/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, William Tam <email.wtam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/8/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/8/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > > On 10/8/07, William Tam <email.wtam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok i agree. But the problem is we are looking at the seda example
> > > > > > which does NOT populate the out message.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, I know seda component only supports in-only MEP and the producer
> > > > > process is considered done once the exchange is enqueued.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok good.
> > > >
> > > > > I am kind of looking at the bigger picture.   Suppose
> > > > > from("seda:queue").to("a") is my route and endpoint "a" supports
> > > > > in-out MEP.  I'm afraid it is hard for me to get the populated
> > > > > exchange back from of "a".  I realize that you are advising me not
to
> > > > > use seda componet and I have no problem with that.  So, is SEDA
> > > > > strictly an in-only MEP architecture or is it a Camel impl specific?
> > > >
> > > > Since you acknowledge that seda supports in only exchanges, why do you
> > > > find it odd that its "hard for me to get the populated exchange back
> > > > from of "a".
> > > >
> > > > I think that perhaps our seda component is miss named.  I think that
> > > > your are thinking of the SEDA pattern and that this component should
> > > > fully support it.  Unfortunately it does not.  Would everything be
> > > > more clear if the seda: component was renamed to memory-queue: ?
> > >
> > > +1.  Anything but SEDA. vm:// sounds good too imho, or queue://.
> > > SEDA is confusing.
> > >
> > +1 queue://
> >
>
> lol it used to be called queue:// but folks confused it with JMS queues.
>
> -1 queue:// :)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message