calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: Avatica includes jackson in the jar
Date Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:13:43 GMT
Frankly, just using provided scope and requiring version 2.* might be a
better course.

This would particularly be true if any of the Jackson classes are used in
any API's.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Josh Elser <> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
> Yup, you're spot-on with relocation the classes. I only relocated the
> protobuf classes because I had just added them. Didn't think to also do
> that with the Jackson classes. Really, anything that gets shaded should be,
> AFAIK. Want to open a JIRA issue?
> As for updating Jackson, I'd have to look at the changelog. It's probably
> going to be OK, but you never know what issues might sneak in when updating
> the dependency. A JIRA issue for this would also be good.
> Thanks for letting us know!
> - Josh
> Mike Hinchey wrote:
>> I'm have difficulty building my project which uses both calcite and
>> another
>> lib that uses a different version of fasterxml/jackson.
>> I found that avatica builds an uberjar, using mvn-shade to rename the
>> protobuf package, but also includes the jackson classes in the jar.  This
>> is the case since 1.5.0, not before.  Is that intentional?
>> Should the jackson packages also be renamed/shaded within avatica?
>> Incidentally, jackson 2.1.1 is from 2012.  The latest stable release is
>> 2.6.3.  All tests pass with the new version.
>> Thanks,
>> Mike

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message