From dev-return-1550-apmail-calcite-dev-archive=calcite.apache.org@calcite.incubator.apache.org Wed Jul 29 07:58:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25EA418E76 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70194 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2015 07:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@calcite.apache.org Received: (qmail 70130 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2015 07:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@calcite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70119 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2015 07:58:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4FF2A193117 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MyD0MVUFigX for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relayvx12c.securemail.intermedia.net (relayvx12c.securemail.intermedia.net [64.78.52.187]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7F168213B7 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from securemail.intermedia.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by emg-ca-1-2.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id E891853E6B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT available, MASTER closed, please try it out MIME-Version: 1.0 x-echoworx-emg-received: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:07.999 -0700 x-echoworx-msg-id: 9da5686b-f51a-4e41-b5cc-29f898ba50f5 x-echoworx-action: delivered Received: from 10.254.155.17 ([10.254.155.17]) by emg-ca-1-2 (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.2) with SMTP ID 673 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net (unknown [10.224.117.102]) by emg-ca-1-2.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id C717353E6B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.101) by MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:06 -0700 Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.101]) by mbx080-w4-co-1.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:58:06 -0700 From: Jesus Camachorodriguez To: "dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org" Thread-Topic: 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT available, MASTER closed, please try it out Thread-Index: AQHQxoKTWcX3w+iX9U2Ji0ZCEnQoBZ3wLlgAgAHCKgCAAAsPgIAAYMUAgAAHN4CAAANWAIAAS40A Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8562B664-8E97-41D7-816E-62B05699C1A5@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [2.138.42.199] x-source-routing-agent: Processed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've finally been able to trigger a Hive QA run. I have logged CALCITE-821 which is making all our tests fail. We will be checking into that today. Thanks, Jes=FAs On 7/29/15, 7:27 AM, "Jacques Nadeau" wrote: >Ok. Will do. > >On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> Can you please take a look at 741, 743, Jacques. They're best done >> while you're actually rolling a release. >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> wrote: >> > Julian, are you looking at 741/743 or should I take a look? >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> > >> >> I think you should include 811. It adds 3 new instances of a rule but >> >> does not change the existing one. >> >> >> >> I don't believe that Hive's test run has finished. Jesus, can you >> >> report when you have some results? >> >> >> >> Still to do are release-related changes: release notes, 741, 743. I >> >> can do the web site after the RC. >> >> >> >> I was hoping to get Maryann's patch to 793 in, but I still don't have >> >> a test case, so let's defer that one. >> >> >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> >> wrote: >> >> > It seems like everyone is happy with the current release. The >>issue >> >> > identified by Hive looks like it was a Hive fix rather than a >>Calcite >> >> one. >> >> > I noticed that Jesus committed one thing after my proposed release. >> Do >> >> > people feel like that is absolutely required in this release/the >>risk >> >> > involved? I'm fine including it but am initially inclined to >>leave it >> >> for >> >> > the next release if it isn't pressing. The jira: >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-811 >> >> > >> >> > Thoughts? >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Julian Hyde >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I=B9ve tried the compile against Hive[1], fixed a minor problem >> (related >> >> to >> >> >> SortFactory), and now Jesus is going to run the Hive suite. >> >> >> >> >> >> Jacques, If you=B9re writing release notes you might find my >> relNotes[2] >> >> >> script useful. >> >> >> >> >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11383 >> >> >> [2] https://github.com/julianhyde/share/blob/master/tools/relNotes >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 24, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > I've pushed a 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT to the Apache Snapshot Repo. >> Framework >> >> >> > owners, please try out this branch and report back whether you >>see >> any >> >> >> > showstopping regressions. That way we can work out any kinks >> before >> >> we >> >> >> put >> >> >> > this to an actual release vote. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You can to the current commit by adding the following maven >> snapshot >> >> >> > repository to your pom.xml: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The version of the artifacts to reference is 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT. >>The >> >> >> artifacts >> >> >> > are currently based on git commit >> >> >> 5cb95e644f38da1a13d6def96eeec935b650289c. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I'll target sending an actual release vote EOD Tuesday unless we >> find >> >> >> > additional issues. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> > Jacques >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>