Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA28200D23 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3E1931609EE; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 835A51609D7 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:20:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 14978 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2017 17:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@bval.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@bval.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@bval.apache.org Received: (qmail 14961 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2017 17:20:17 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:20:17 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 62BF01A012F for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id w197so16076228oif.6 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXCyP4QvN2zS/m+YpEe0Nn6nqL5T8rluVEHKdiXLFkRRmQ6rpcS /660oQNf9mtHrZdqUIWTQWodNmSuSAgUdDcJYx8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+S/zwTbRKvd9ahi9VhLiZTxVg46B+zNwTTPpxNWOmfnErFjEpCGf6x9z/z/Mrxscw83ivtVCarATUnK/o/zBZY= X-Received: by 10.202.84.10 with SMTP id i10mr1189468oib.152.1508433616865; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.151.234 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.74.151.234 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matt Benson Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:20:15 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bean Validation 2.0 Support? To: user@bval.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ac8dce6949a055be991e7" archived-at: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:20:19 -0000 --001a113ac8dce6949a055be991e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Work on this is in progress. No firm ETA, but I might guess it could be available by the end of the year. Matt On Oct 19, 2017 11:57 AM, "Nathan Mittlestat" wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering if someone could provide details on the status of Apache > Bean Validation supporting the 2.0 version of the spec? The Open Liberty > team is currently working on Java EE 8 support. We have traditionally > shipped Apache Bean Validation for prior spec levels, and would like to > continue to do so. Any details would be greatly appreciated! > > My apologies if this shows up on the dev mailing list as well. I > accidentally sent this to the dev list, but it never showed up. > > > Thanks, > Nathan Mittlestat > Open Liberty Development > --001a113ac8dce6949a055be991e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Work on this is in progress. No firm ETA, but I might gue= ss it could be available by the end of the year.

Matt

On Oct 19, 2017 11:57 AM, "Nathan Mittlestat" &= lt;nmittles@gmail.com> wrote:<= br type=3D"attribution">
Hello,

I'm wondering if someone could provide details on the= =20 status of Apache Bean Validation supporting the 2.0 version of the=20 spec?=C2=A0 The Open Liberty team is currently working on Java EE 8 support= .=C2=A0 We have traditionally shipped Apache Bean Validation for prior spec=20 levels, and would like to continue to do so.=C2=A0 Any details would be=20 greatly appreciated!

My apologies if this shows up on the dev = mailing list as well. I accidentally sent this to the dev list, but it neve= r showed up.


Thanks,
Nathan Mittlestat
Open Liberty D= evelopment
--001a113ac8dce6949a055be991e7--