Return-Path: 
 <user-return-109-apmail-bval-user-archive=bval.apache.org@bval.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-bval-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-bval-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9DF10CE2
	for <apmail-bval-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 44864 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2013 18:52:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-bval-user-archive@bval.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44829 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2013 18:52:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@bval.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@bval.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@bval.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@bval.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.bval.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@bval.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@bval.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44821 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2013 18:52:58 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:52:58 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.169] (HELO mail-ea0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.215.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:52:54 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k11so4205530eaj.0
        for <user@bval.apache.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=L9QWqYx/L5N+L2/sBQqdjSr+Ns5RxIa3vFLf1sjgWKs=;
        b=e9SurFeH+lqNcE27indQj1Bj17FDTQjd/mFKwep4apzd8hJmeEWm85TLnIe4Heuuba
         zlWGEzFSef+ALti4sIC/YjWEh8a4WB3xC1xVPV7MQIueDRd8aBdBgCrNhCUJS3bqDOVz
         Fntcf/MLhSpIr+uuzl7s2TNyrIm4gw+Nm1PjeUxmvefKTZ+VVrBf6+qg+rei5NI0MfC2
         ZS3oD1xT6ZAGGz3EZx3JmLialKQjTl7ecpSpMFntJHyPmpGqPwQvUanUZG+UO/uvkngT
         /qxIO35dlE0ZO/d5Lthy6NTF3cAMXtlkPKXCp68PvNaSMUg52JVklNE/jpO1I0u+w5ot
         dmRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.29.67 with SMTP id h43mr2827771eea.7.1381863153157; Tue,
 15 Oct 2013 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.85.70 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAJB1JMy6jWZgPHBWbxJR9q4cHQFmtWo2zzBBuaLBOY7PV1sXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAJB1JMy6jWZgPHBWbxJR9q4cHQFmtWo2zzBBuaLBOY7PV1sXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:52:33 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9L6G3WVYZubL2soYxe9rE527sfpbYmPJ-t1hG-kFdwLYafQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: buildDefaultValidatorFactory and Validation.byDefaultProvider()
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
To: user@bval.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c370f25f4a2a04e8cc164b
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c370f25f4a2a04e8cc164b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

These should be equivalent. Calling #configure() against the default
ValidationProvider just gives you the opportunity to alter a configuration
before using it to produce a ValidatorFactory.

Matt


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Umesh Awasthi <umeshawasthi@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for asking one question after another, i am wondering what
> difference it can make if i use
>
>  Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory()
>
> and Validation.byDefaultProvider().configure()..buildValidatorFactory()
>
> Thanks
> Umesh
>
>
>
> --
> With Regards
> Umesh Awasthi
> http://www.travellingrants.com/
>
>
>

--001a11c370f25f4a2a04e8cc164b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">These should be equivalent. Calling #configure() against t=
he default ValidationProvider just gives you the opportunity to alter a con=
figuration before using it to produce a ValidatorFactory.<div><br></div><di=
v>
Matt</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quot=
e">On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Umesh Awasthi <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:umeshawasthi@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">umeshawasthi@gmail=
.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi All,<br><br></div>S=
orry for asking one question after another, i am wondering what difference =
it can make if i use<br>
<br><pre><code> Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory()<br><br></code></p=
re><pre><code>and Validation.byDefaultProvider().configure()..buildValidato=
rFactory()<br><br></code></pre><pre><code></code><code>Thanks<span class=3D=
"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Umesh<br></font></span></code></pre><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#=
888888"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div><br>-- <br>With Regards<br>Umesh Awasth=
i<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.travellingrants.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.tr=
avellingrants.com/</a><br><br>=A0 =A0=20
</div></div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c370f25f4a2a04e8cc164b--