Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alex.boisvert@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=QSftJ9CIXFmq70ZwwvH1Mk64SwUQIXmpqLx1BykIUqC+3gwPoT7W0uWibjyTso9QGE
         OuM416dnCWZtDIHI091Sbo55ei/eZ2V9SPKBxjq1022Tnr33Xvz3AqqI8w54ifBKKo6F
         ADV2hkNypa0ymu24i9AnBvYkSiYtyK4qZwcEY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A0A1BEA0-AD4B-4524-9BAC-CCBB274DD18D@parboiled.org>
References: <FCE17199-53FB-4CBB-BD88-DCB72BB9362E@parboiled.org>
	<AANLkTinHrPfXkBQzwzvxa-_FEOZpVJwP8E1YQgY7VVgv@mail.gmail.com>
	<A0A1BEA0-AD4B-4524-9BAC-CCBB274DD18D@parboiled.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:12:32 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-n6xd28LGn+2kdT0dz-W-pjxoNO7v-RHq6Bn1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issue BUILDR-520
From: Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com>
To: users@buildr.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368332c0b71c11049ad7e44a

--0016368332c0b71c11049ad7e44a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yeah, I briefly thought about that yesterday but the one thing that stopped
me was that deciding on a qualifier for the package (e.g., Java uses
-javadoc).   Looks like SBT is using -docs for scaladoc packaging.  I'm
seeing both -javadoc, -scaladoc used for Scala projects deployed on
scala-tools.org.   Probably should make it configurable at this point,
though we still have to pick a good default (I'm leaning towards -scaladoc).

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-564 to track this.

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-564>alex


On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Mathias <mathias@parboiled.org> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> cool. Thanks for the quick fix.
> Btw. wouldn't it be nicer if I could write "package :scaladoc" instead of
> "package :javadoc" for my Scala-only modules?
>
> Cheers,
> Mathias
>
> ---
> mathias@parboiled.org
> http://www.parboiled.org
>
> On 26.01.2011, at 21:04, Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> > Hi Mathias,
> >
> > I just fixed this in trunk.   I hadn't tested with package(:javadoc).
> > Thanks for reporting.
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Mathias <mathias@parboiled.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Just a short heads-up:
> >>
> >> Issue 520 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-520) is marked
> as
> >> "resolved" in JIRA, however, with the current trunk snapshot it's not
> >> possible to have Buildr generate scaladoc against Scala 2.8.1.
> >> The trace shows that the "doc-title" option is correctly set, however
> the
> >> old "-windowtitle" option is also present, which causes scaladoc to exit
> >> with an error instead of actually building the documentation.
> >>
> >> Could you reopen issue 520?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mathias
> >> ---
> >> mathias@parboiled.org
> >> http://www.parboiled.org
> >>
> >>
>
>

--0016368332c0b71c11049ad7e44a--