Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59142 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 20:45:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 20:45:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 91591 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 20:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 91534 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 20:45:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 91526 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 20:45:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:45:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alex.boisvert@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:45:11 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so76526wwi.5 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:44:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gLSoCl5BfQcY4vs82crF22hht1dbEGPLE0lr+4N0IHI=; b=yC3VPMRETvlGLOGX/0FbsFk7D/Tcz+W0bZXVfPNgDCEdXHjGGq2vGu6HIeEdp/0z3j /iu2B70sElynESQCc2AmyBRVzLFoCuyuHQ6/ffhOSAGu46rt6/bVK4n18IAp7eZ5RNHM Jel/vC9MFklTcbCFJoXTxqiLbYy22f4kZPYGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=x6/7AYTbs+eGc4tFzvC8ZO8O+/hpp4houPaxkrQPXN896oI5IQ++N0/Q5PwF2YSfya MZkL/Q/C4kuxiqbvGFOGtLOTLZWzVJd1FHHmo12MhKaGVKe7wQUxQv6gf/Wvd4slZbYA FYHKu6PgIczsVbHCFVG/RMQefFExLTZiXp6s4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.201 with SMTP id a9mr1200328wbj.24.1295037875281; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.134.67 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:44:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D30A52D.9070108@der-ingo.de> References: <4D30561A.2070901@der-ingo.de> <4D30A52D.9070108@der-ingo.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:44:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Installing on Ubuntu 10.10 From: Alex Boisvert To: users@buildr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44c3c86e2170499d48078 --001485f44c3c86e2170499d48078 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ingo Schmidt wrote: > So what IS the recommended way to install buildr? And should it not > actually install buildr somewhere in PATH by default? > The instructions provided on the site _should_ install buildr somewhere on the PATH (during "gem install buildr"). I don't know why they don't, or whether this only happens in some environments. (Last time I installed buildr on my Ubuntu 10.4 system, it worked fine) > Is installing RubyGems from source indeed the recommended way, even though > it might work with the Debian packages? > 'gem install buildr' is the recommended way for those who want an easy install. Installing from source involves more steps and requires additional environment dependencies. alex --001485f44c3c86e2170499d48078--