Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49808 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 36510 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36367 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36359 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:20:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antoine.toulme@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.172] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:20:44 +0000 Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so2525132iwn.17 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=tUjnTYg0GaPDpDhx+Ikl9qcusJR991dTjzr5v4SiAmM=; b=pLA5U62X9EaN5k8URlIfFiOrXKdeQX2nJphrMiypGkXTURZyc5tGqb/jMnZvx06h5O +WikOUhkC8hMIGKjWsECEHQsVCxv/QucmvT6AT5XYSpMfmwcuqJqkpGkSFNyxX/g5MY1 Odw3HDmo+PK0/YvCB/6nFsNbnwyhoRqMaAm9o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=TEcXcpAof6dvxVf0dhnPT+utv+mI/n9sDZPpne/4oJMH3eiKdGfcYxg/VtwFlp3ZGY n2OBJoxvdIFYvGHfiDHE+dT1kyuJqritLgezl4BCt6jxSebFbCHA3+O+q5GsoWWOlZfD tCYhcE1v7rZtT8Pw5EgKEfDhZAp7Ae65MSLmg= Received: by 10.42.175.193 with SMTP id bb1mr5508182icb.103.1288286423249; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antoine.toulme@gmail.com Reply-To: antoine@lunar-ocean.com Received: by 10.231.39.68 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:20:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Antoine Toulme Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:20:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _ClgDXQbUrAE2bsFofBD1kuxVOk Message-ID: Subject: Re: JVM To: users@buildr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba613532a071c80493b08e7a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba613532a071c80493b08e7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So what's the exact error message, and how did you update your JVM ? With the usual Mac software update ? Thanks, Antoine On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:03, Ed Smiley wrote: > Thanks for getting back to me Alex, > > Nah, > > That's not it. :( > > $ $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -version > java version "1.6.0_22" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04-307-10M3261) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03-307, mixed mode) > > $ buildr -V > Buildr 1.4.3 > > $ uname -a > ... Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; > root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 > > > (I'm on a Mac.) > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Alex Boisvert >wrote: > > > I think RJB will use JAVA_HOME to locate the JVM's native libs. Is you > > JAVA_HOME set correctly? > > > > You may also want to check rjb's home page for additional info. > > http://rjb.rubyforge.org > > (they do mention that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is needed but it's not; it may help > > though...) > > > > alex > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Ed Smiley wrote: > > > > > Hi, I recently updated my JVM. I am invoking the Java object to check > > that > > > certain specified classes in config files can actually be instantiated > > from > > > the path of the build. When I do that, I now get a missing JVM > message, > > and > > > yet, Java is still in my path. > > > > > > Can you shed any light on this? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Ed > > > --90e6ba613532a071c80493b08e7a--