Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antoine.toulme@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=j4/FEGMTbze+lmoFCK0352sMP58rZicpJ97wFsTEgYc6CnTno7LptqWHA6VgIAmqIm
         D1t5ZaqXH5SDm9sXv4/op8Xot2GizWALVZoYZbsi3mDbsl5x0AWRulEvZyXmuDJYcrxn
         98AnLXpUvRG0jWazQuz3+wWKjo46MxV8rdMmI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antoine.toulme@gmail.com
Reply-To: antoine@lunar-ocean.com
In-Reply-To: <FC346A64-E88B-42D7-8D3E-C1A94D35DCF4@detailedbalance.net>
References: <AANLkTilHT5MnXgsX8W2vTNPKO6HlNY8dO6lZuxKhxUTS@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCbVk-0PhxPSx8wCjvfcMHdhFQ9njM5MCBNU49@mail.gmail.com>
	<FC346A64-E88B-42D7-8D3E-C1A94D35DCF4@detailedbalance.net>
From: Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:17:50 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAANvFvs8fUh537NjPU5XW2ioLQf52aVJ0NK8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
To: users@buildr.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138

--0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

JRuby 1.6 targets supporting 1.9. When they do we can think of moving on.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:38, Rhett Sutphin <rhett@detailedbalance.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> > Hi Kristof,
> >
> > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress.  Thanks for
> reporting.
> > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a
> trivial
> > fix) it would be appreciated.
>
> I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious
> problem:  it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is
> activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's
> case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests.
>
> Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related.  I don't
> think this can be fixed in buildr.
>
> Rhett
>
> [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140
>
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jozsa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
> >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
> >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
> >> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
> >>
> >> The issue is shown here:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
> >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
> >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
> >>
> >> thanks a lot,
> >> K
> >>
>
>

--0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138--