Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mrundberget@hotmail.com
 designates 65.55.34.203 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <COL103-W402067FD82FB42F70E540DACC70@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_9e94c47e-d20e-4c86-ba86-7120687a0639_"
From: Magnus Rundberget <mrundberget@hotmail.com>
To: <users@buildr.apache.org>
Subject: RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:19:38 +0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik0VCJb8tYimE4gVrdXahMd6GZT8TZyZaPjT4LO@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <COL103-W65143CAE223BBFBBF9F899ACC60@phx.gbl>,<AANLkTik0VCJb8tYimE4gVrdXahMd6GZT8TZyZaPjT4LO@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_9e94c47e-d20e-4c86-ba86-7120687a0639_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi=2C=20

=20

Thx for swift reply!

=20

I timestamped the log output and it appears that running junit-tests in one=
 of the subprojects is significantly slower with buildr 1.4.0.

3 seconds with buildr 1.3.5=2C 16 seconds with buildr 1.4.0.

=20

Many of the tests are failing (130 of 200)=2C so I'm running with :fail_on_=
failure=3D>false. (The tests are failing because I haven't ported our custo=
m mocking framework using aspects yet).

=20

So it appears running tests with junit might be an area to investigate furt=
her.

=20

cheers

Magnus

=20

=20

=20


=20
> Date: Thu=2C 24 Jun 2010 10:23:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> From: alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> To: users@buildr.apache.org
>=20
> I haven't noticed any slowdown myself but I'm not building big projects m=
uch
> these days.
>=20
> The issue could be Buildr itself or any one of our dependencies. There we=
re
> many upgrades in the 1.3.5 -> 1.4.0 transition. To make this actionable=
=2C
> you would have to identify whether it happens in a specific part of the
> build (e.g. a specific project=2C a specific task like junit testing=2C .=
..) or
> whether it's just general slowness (not tied to any specific part).
>=20
> alex
>=20
> On Thu=2C Jun 24=2C 2010 at 5:54 AM=2C Magnus Rundberget
> <mrundberget@hotmail.com>wrote:
>=20
> >
> > Hi=2C
> >
> > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
> >
> > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran th=
e
> > build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
> >
> > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.=
5 ?
> >
> > kind regards
> > Magnus
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969
> >
 		 	   		 =20
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969=

--_9e94c47e-d20e-4c86-ba86-7120687a0639_--