Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69784 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2009 16:19:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2009 16:19:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 79057 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2009 16:19:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-users-archive@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79038 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2009 16:19:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@buildr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79027 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2009 16:19:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:19:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of boisvert@intalio.com designates 209.85.198.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.231] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:19:02 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so1832508rvb.17 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:18:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.74.18 with SMTP id w18mr1303406waa.40.1235319519377; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:18:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5c99d0330902160729v5c71cd8at70ca0d3a4fe6c78e@mail.gmail.com> References: <5582dd3b0902152137t4ed831d4g577a1f33e275b9bf@mail.gmail.com> <5582dd3b0902152140g47e0e290s7d7e831da96e1eb3@mail.gmail.com> <8D34F56A-5F44-40AC-8DCA-B49583A7D957@gmail.com> <5c99d0330902160729v5c71cd8at70ca0d3a4fe6c78e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:18:39 -0800 Message-ID: <5582dd3b0902220818l11a63bdbra0a010eb5b586870@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Scala 2.7.1 as default? From: Alex Boisvert To: users@buildr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641793122f9620463843d95 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163641793122f9620463843d95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok, I've now upgraded the Scala dependencies. alex On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > git://github.com/djspiewak/buildr.git / separate-scala-specs > > Specs: 1.4.3 > ScalaCheck: 1.5 > > git://github.com/djspiewak/buildr.git / master > > "" > "" > ScalaTest: 0.9.4 > > The ScalaTest version increment is untested with Buildr, but the other two > are working fine (and have been for a while). > > Daniel > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Spiewak > wrote: > > > I don't know anything about ScalaTest, but Specs and ScalaCheck are both > > updated within my Git fork. http://github.com/djspiewak/buildr > > > > Daniel > > > > > > On Feb 15, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Alex Boisvert > wrote: > > > > (Resending... forgot the "s" in users@buildr.apache.org) > >> > >> Buildr currently assumes Scala 2.7.1 as default by its choice of test > >> libraries (scala-specs 1.2.9, scalatest 0.9.3 and scalacheck 1.3) which > >> are > >> binary-incompatible with newer versions of Scala. > >> > >> Would anyone object to upgrading these libraries to the latest currently > >> available? I understand we want to maintain backward compatibility in > >> Buildr but if no one is still using Scala 2.7.1 then I don't think it > >> makes > >> much sense to do so. > >> > >> Perhaps it would make more sense to have no library defaults until > things > >> have stabilized? (i.e., require users to specify versions in > build.yaml) > >> > >> alex > >> > > > --00163641793122f9620463843d95--