Mailing-List: contact buildr-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: buildr-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of djspiewak@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.20 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=FaHMQ475W092YugyQmX6ckapVfUeu1vrF1CMCanoF5mTUI+4lIB7BDlkuS5qHaedN7
         MOwQJ0RzWvMdY01LkVB0vfsxgZiVgcNvipHvJB+dTFSiyytwNqjvF3BpBvVE5D7Z6M/G
         QPf42qvjH3p5TjePNe/fmK1jxfH+KnzNXGDaM=
Message-ID: <5c99d0330901051528h19372b94t99f508d451b05299@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:28:05 -0600
From: "Daniel Spiewak" <djspiewak@gmail.com>
To: buildr-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Interactive Shell Support
In-Reply-To: <5582dd3b0901051500u5277aee3if92fbc9245c72971@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_185169_19615040.1231198085531"
References: <5c99d0330901032203pbc6a3fdq645782c8921d9a1a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5582dd3b0901040906k2807a1abi8bb5c21e98484e4a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5c99d0330901051235l6d98857evfdae1c00399c9fa2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9490AE15-3CF8-433C-8D40-6C70855C9F0A@intalio.com>
	 <5c99d0330901051344y5807ce2dh463bce14ef4b96bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5582dd3b0901051400l5db15f5bs9b8eb451a3f051bf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5c99d0330901051410g54410f71v712b5dba9221ce75@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5582dd3b0901051445o740dc913i55873cd027aa185b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5c99d0330901051455q56a65b84v20dcfc7af5064c26@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5582dd3b0901051500u5277aee3if92fbc9245c72971@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_185169_19615040.1231198085531
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Incidentally, should we make tasks like `shell:jirb` project-local, or just
`shell`?

Daniel

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Assaf's parametrized idea seems like the "proper" way to do this, but I
> > don't like the syntax.  At least to my eye, shell:jirb is *much* nicer
> and
> > more consistent with the "Buildr philosphy" than shell[jirb].  Besides,
> the
> > former is marginally easier to type.
>
>
> I feel the same way.   I'm curious to see if many Rake-based projects will
> adopt this new convention.
>
>
> > We could use your multiple-tasks idea without too much hardship in the
> > implementation.  I've got all the providers in a Hash, so a simple .each
> {
> > |lang, prov| define_task ... } should be sufficient.  I'm fine with doing
> > it
> > this way as long as y'all are ok with it.  :-)
>
>
> One precedent I can think of is the form "buildr test:SomeTest", which I
> like so I'm supportive of following our existing convention.
>
> alex
>

------=_Part_185169_19615040.1231198085531--