Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37743 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 05:35:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 05:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 15574 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 05:35:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-buildr-dev-archive@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 15512 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 05:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@buildr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@buildr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@buildr.apache.org Received: (qmail 15504 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 05:35:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:35:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antoine.toulme@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.221] (HELO mail-gx0-f221.google.com) (209.85.217.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:35:07 +0000 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so761776gxk.2 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:received :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=1vOr/I46kFq8uBdaQoUprvbqC9v9cQlNWyoo4enxWOY=; b=DymBtSbCxG0gj207WPa7QAZ5rKtfk7wDUvBDOYgdyWnBXZIStqFQxGzwEhvH4pPTXP dc/CebDIiWq311rjTEdsLSsPLtqac4MUymuc6CyHrUkD+RWOFcPj2DhyAfBSR2EP9606 72TTMDONuh3WvkDv90F/VEvBbRH7jwjJZGkzY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=FipRFlnjvZaOEiUoSvEm03Z+O1guJY5KerMpoUcuwGsRJ4PAxifRZhIwWBUBs7rnOX Z7fD2h3CaD3jF01zFPX+TO8SUaZLYXtMz6FAdhD1e4U9xKrsY7bEJ5oEeyjpGtKZA6zE d+eYuCLZq/wDYKoGLHc0R7mT9F00vaiauyv+8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antoine.toulme@gmail.com Reply-To: antoine@lunar-ocean.com Received: by 10.231.157.200 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:34:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Antoine Toulme Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:34:26 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 96aec492c623da45 Received: by 10.150.165.11 with SMTP id n11mr856508ybe.185.1270100086193; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Working on a RC To: dev@buildr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd34228777ee104832638eb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd34228777ee104832638eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm making some good progress - BUILDR-411 is fixed, we now can generate the RDoc. I also reported BUILDR-412, for which I'm taking time before I commit anything - I might try fixing the Gem API calls first or something. I actually run into a new problem on my machine. It looks like running rake stage leaves a lot of open files, to the point that I cannot fork anymore, and I just had to reboot after a kernel panic. Running rake rdoc works fine though, so this must be related to the way rdoc is launched in stage, or I'm doing something wrong. Does this ring a bell for anyone ? Antoine On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 23:12, Antoine Toulme wrote: > I'm working on a first RC for 1.4 and am hitting a few issues. In the > coming days I'll file bugs and might make some commits directly on the > staged.rake file. > > I already did one today and will probably make one more tonight. I'm > generating all the artifacts allright but there is a failure in the RDoc > process. > > Will fix that as time permits this week. > > Thanks, > > Antoine > --000e0cd34228777ee104832638eb--